<![CDATA[<body><script type="text/javascript">
function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) {
if(window.addEventListener) {
window.addEventListener('load',
function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false);
} else {
window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; });
}
}
</script>
<div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() {
if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) {
gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({
url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/9732461?origin\x3dhttps://jaszz.blogspot.com',
where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"),
id: "navbar-iframe",
messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER,
messageHandlers: {
'blogger-ping': function() {}
}
});
}
});
</script>]]>
Sunday, June 17, 2007
~ 8:36 AM ~
Country A has never liked other countries interferring in its internal affairs. Country A always defends it as "domestic issues" in its own point of view, and that should not be interferred by other countries.
However, when certain people visits Country B, Country A makes a big hoo-ha over it and expresses its obvious displeasure and anger against Country B. Now, why is Country A interferring in Country B when certain people visiting Country B is also a 'domestic issue' in the point of view of Country B?
